小柔

小柔柔

Everything over the internet is secured by the passwords. You need a login to do any stuff on any social or banking website. Passwords are the first security measure for these type of websites. So, I brought a tutorial on how to hack such sort of login passwords. This tutorial is based on credential harvester attack method. In which you will know about hacking passwords using credential harvester attack method.

HACKING PASSWORDS USING CREDENTIAL HARVESTER ATTACK

REQUIREMENTS

It's very simple and easy to follow. Before you start, you need the following things to work with.

Kali Linux OS
Target Website

STEPS TO FOLLOW

Run the Kali Linux machine. If you have not Kali Linux installed, you can grab a free copy and install it as a virtual machine. You can learn more about Kali Linux VirtualBox installation.
Sign in to Kali Linux by entering username root and password toor.
As you'll sign in, navigate to the Applications > Social Engineering Tools > Social Engineering as shown in the following screenshot.
Now you will see the different options. You have to choose Social Engineering Attacks by simply entering its number in the terminal. Once you do it, it will show a few options further. Simply choose Website Vector Attack by putting its number.
Website vector attack will show up it's a different type of attacks. We are going to use Credential Harvester Attack.
Choose the Site Clone option. As you do it, it will ask for your public IP address. Just open up a new terminal and type ifconfig. It'll show the public IP. Just copy it and paste in the previous terminal as shown in the following screenshots.
After we do it. Enter the target website of which passwords you want to hack. Make sure to use a website that has username and password on the same page.
All done now. As someone opens up the browser on the public IP we specified, it'll show up the website that we entered in the previous step. Now as someone enters their username or password, it will be captured in the terminal.

That's all. If you're not clear yet. You can watch the following complete video tutorial on how to do it.

Related news

小柔柔

This is the second blog post in the "Attacking financial malware botnet panels" series. After playing with Zeus, my attention turned to another old (and dead) botnet, SpyEye. From an ITSEC perspective, SpyEye shares a lot of vulnerabilities with Zeus.

The following report is based on SpyEye 1.3.45, which is old, and if we are lucky, the whole SpyEye branch will be dead soon.

Google dorks to find SpyEye C&C server panel related stuff:

if the img directory gets indexed, it is rather easy, search for e.g. inurl:b-ftpbackconnect.png
if the install directory gets indexed, again, easy, search for e.g. inurl:spylogo.png
also, if you find a login screen, check the css file (style.css), and you see #frm_viewlogs, #frm_stat, #frm_botsmon_country, #frm_botstat, #frm_gtaskloader and stuff like that, you can be sure you found it
otherwise, it is the best not to Google for it, but get a SpyEye sample and analyze it

And this is how the control panel login looks like, nothing sophisticated:

The best part is that you don't have to guess the admin's username ;)

This is how an average control panel looks like:

Hack the Planet! :)

Boring vulns found (warning, an almost exact copy from the Zeus blog post)

Clear text HTTP login - you can sniff the login password via MiTM, or steal the session cookies
No password policy - admins can set up really weak passwords
No anti brute-force - you can try to guess the admin's password. There is no default username, as there is no username handling!
Password autocomplete enabled - boring
Missing HttpOnly flag on session cookie - interesting when combining with XSS
No CSRF protection - e.g. you can upload new exe, bin files, turn plugins on/off :-( boring. Also the file extension check can be bypassed, but the files are stored in the database, so no PHP shell this time. If you check the following code, you can see that even the file extension and type is checked, and an error is shown, but the upload process continues. And even if the error would stop the upload process, the check can be fooled by setting an invalid $uptype. Well done ...

        if ($_FILES['file']['tmp_name'] && ($_FILES['file']['size'] > 0))         {                 $outstr = "<br>";                 set_time_limit(0);                 $filename = str_replace(" ","_",$_FILES['file']['name']);                 $ext = substr($filename, strrpos($filename, '.')+1);                 if( $ext==='bin' && $uptype!=='config' ) $outstr .= "<font class='error'>Bad CONFIG extension!</font><br>";                 if( $ext==='exe' && $uptype!=='body' && $uptype!=='exe' ) $outstr .= "<font class='error'>Bad extension!</font><br>";                  switch( $uptype )                 {                 case 'body': $ext = 'b'; break;                 case 'config': $ext = 'c'; break;                 case 'exe': $ext = 'e'; break;                 default: $ext = 'e';                 }                 $_SESSION['file_ext'] = $ext;                 if( isset($_POST['bots']) && trim($_POST['bots']) !== '')                 {                         $bots = explode(' ', trim($_POST['bots']));                         //writelog("debug.log", trim($_POST['bots']));                         $filename .= "_".(LastFileId()+1);                 }                 if( FileExist($filename) ) $filename .= LastFileId();                 $tmpName  = $_FILES['file']['tmp_name'];                 $fileSize = $_FILES['file']['size'];                 $fileType = $_FILES['file']['type'];                 ## reading all file for calculating hash                 $fp = fopen($tmpName, 'r');

Clear text password storage - the MySQL passwords are stored in php files, in clear text. Also, the login password to the form panel is stored in clear text.
MD5 password - the passwords stored in MySQL are MD5 passwords. No PBKDF2, bcrypt, scrypt, salt, whatever. MD5. Just look at the pure simplicity of the login check, great work!

$query = "SELECT * FROM users_t WHERE uPswd='".md5($pswd)."'";

ClickJacking - really boring stuff

SQL injection

SpyEye has a fancy history of SQL injections. See details here, here, here, video here and video here.

It is important to highlight the fact that most of the vulnerable functions are reachable without any authentication, because these PHP files lack user authentication at the beginning of the files.

But if a C&C server owner gets pwned through this vuln, it is not a good idea to complain to the developer, because after careful reading of the install guide, one can see:

"For searching info in the collector database there is a PHP interface as formgrabber admin panel. The admin panel is not intended to be found on the server. This is a client application."

And there are plenty of reasons not to install the formgrabber admin panel on any internet reachable server. But this fact leads to another possible vulnerability. The user for this control panel is allowed to remotely login to the MySQL database, and the install guide has pretty good passwords to be reused. I mean it looks pretty secure, there is no reason not to use that.

CREATE USER 'frmcpviewer' IDENTIFIED BY 'SgFGSADGFJSDGKFy2763272qffffHDSJ';

Next time you find a SpyEye panel, and you can connect to the MySQL database, it is worth a shot to try this password.

Unfortunately the default permissions for this user is not enough to write files (select into outfile):

Access denied for user 'frmcpviewer' (using password: YES)

I also made a little experiment with this SQL injection vulnerability. I did set up a live SpyEye botnet panel, created the malware install binaries (droppers), and sent the droppers to the AV companies. And after more and more sandboxes connected to my box, someone started to exploit the SQL injection vulnerability on my server!

63.217.168.90 - - [16/Jun/2014:04:43:00 -0500] "GET /form/frm_boa-grabber_sub.php?bot_guid=&lm=3&dt=%20where%201=2%20union%20select%20@a:=1%20from%20rep1%20where%20@a%20is%20null%20union%20select%20@a:=%20@a%20%2b1%20union%20select%20concat(id,char(1,3,3,7),bot_guid,char(1,3,3,7),process_name,char(1,3,3,7),hooked_func,char(1,3,3,7),url,char(1,3,3,7),func_data)%20from%20rep2_20140610%20where%20@a=3%23 HTTP/1.1" 200 508 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)"

Although the query did not return any meaningful data to the attacker (only data collected from sandboxes), it raises some legal questions.

Which company/organization has the right to attack my server?

police (having a warrant)
military (if we are at war)
spy agencies (always/never, choose your favorite answer)
CERT organisations?

But, does an AV company or security research company has the legal right to attack my server? I don't think so... The most problematic part is when they hack a server (without authorization), and sell the stolen information in the name of "intelligence service". What is it, the wild wild west?

The SQLi clearly targets the content of the stolen login credentials. If this is not an AV company, but an attacker, how did they got the SpyEye dropper? If this is an AV company, why are they stealing the stolen credentials? Will they notify the internet banking owners about the stolen credentials for free? Or will they do this for money?

And don't get me wrong, I don't want to protect the criminals, but this is clearly a grey area in the law. From an ethical point of view, I agree with hacking the criminal's servers. As you can see, the whole post is about disclosing vulns in these botnet panels. But from a legal point of view, this is something tricky ... I'm really interested in the opinion of others, so comments are warmly welcome.

On a side note, I was interested how did the "attackers" found the SpyEye form directory? Easy, they brute-forced it, with a wordlist having ~43.000 entries.

(Useless) Cross site scripting

Although parts of the SpyEye panel are vulnerable to XSS, it is unlikely that you will to find these components on the server, as these codes are part of the install process, and the installer fails to run if a valid install is found. And in this case, you also need the DB password to trigger the vuln...

Session handling

This is a fun part. The logout button invalidates the session only on the server side, but not on the client side. But if you take into consideration that the login process never regenerates the session cookies (a.k.a session fixation), you can see that no matter how many times the admin logs into the application, the session cookie remains the same (until the admin does not close the browser). So if you find a session cookie which was valid in the past, but is not working at the moment, it is possible that this cookie will be valid in the future ...

Binary server

Some parts of the SpyEye server involve running a binary server component on the server, to collect the form data. It would be interesting to fuzz this component (called sec) for vulns.

Log files revealed

If the form panel mentioned in the SQLi part is installed on the server, it is worth visiting the <form_dir>/logs/error.log file, you might see the path of the webroot folder, IP addresses of the admins, etc.

Reading the code

Sometimes reading the code you can find code snippets, which is hard to understand with a clear mind:

$content = fread($fp, filesize($tmpName)); if ( $uptype === 'config' )     $md5 = GetCRC32($content); else $md5 = md5($content); .... <script> if (navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Mozilla/4.0") != -1) {         alert("Your browser is not support yet. Please, use another (FireFox, Opera, Safari)");         document.getElementById("div_main").innerHTML = "<font class=\'error\'>ChAnGE YOuR BRoWsEr! Dont use BUGGED Microsoft products!</font>"; } </script>

Decrypting SpyEye communication

It turned out that the communication between the malware and C&C server is not very sophisticated (Zeus does a better job at it, because the RC4 key stream is generated from the botnet password).

function DeCode($content) {         $res = '';         for($i = 0; $i < strlen($content); $i++)         {                 $num = ord($content[$i]);                 if( $num != 219) $res .= chr($num^219);         }         return $res; }

Fixed XOR key, again, well done ...

This means that it is easy to create a script, which can communicate with the SpyEye server. For example this can be used to fill in the SpyEye database with crap data.

import binascii import requests import httplib, urllib  def xor_str(a, b):     i = 0     xorred = ''     for i in range(len(a)):         xorred += chr(ord(a[i])^b)     return xorred              b64_data= "vK6yv+bt9er17O3r6vqPnoiPjZb2i5j6muvo6+rjmJ/9rb6p5urr6O/j/bK+5uP16/Xs7evq9ers7urv/bSo5u316vXs7evq/a6v5pq/trK1/bi4qbjm453j6uPv7Or9tr/u5um+uuvpve3p7eq/4+vsveLi7Lnqvrjr6ujs7rjt7rns/au3vOa5sre3srW8s7q2tr6p4Lm3tLiw4LmuvKm+q7Spr+C4uPu8qbq5ub6p4Li4vKm6ubm+qeC4qb6/sq+8qbq54LiuqK+0tri0tbW+uK+0qeC/v7So4L+1qLqrsuC+trqyt7ypurm5vqngvb24vqmvvKm6ubm+qeC9/aivuq/mtLW3srW+" payload =xor_str (binascii.a2b_base64(b64_data), 219)  print ("the decrypted payload is: " + payload) params = (binascii.b2a_base64(xor_str(payload,219))) payload = {'data': params} r = requests.post("http://spyeye.localhost/spyeye/_cg/gate.php", data=payload)

Morale of the story?

Criminals produce the same shitty code as the rest of the world, and thanks to this, some of the malware operators get caught and are behind bars now. And the law is behind the reality, as always.

The story so far ...

Shadow attacks are attacks bypassing the integrity protection of digitally signed PDF documents. The attacks abuse two legitimate features in PDF documents which we briefly explain.

Hiding Content

In PDFs, there are multiple techniques to hide content that is not displayed when the document is opened. We, as attackers, usually hide malicious objects without referencing them in the xref section.

Incremental Updates

New content can be appended to a signed PDF document. This is quite dangerous though. The digital signature in PDFs protects a specific range of bytes. Any appended content does not break the signature verification since it is outside this range. As a result, any new Incremental Update does not violate the cryptographic verification of the digital signature.

But, Incremental Updates are quite dangerous since they may completely change the displayed content of the document. In 2019, we showed different techniques based on Incremental Updates – the Incremental Saving Attacks.
As a countermeasure, most vendors warn if additional content is added after signing the document. BUT … not always!!!

There are meaningful use cases where Incremental Updates in digitally signed documents are allowed. For instance, contracts should be signed by multiple parties and each new signature is applied via additional Incremental Update.
Also, PAdES defines Incremental Updates as part of the long-term validation of digitally signed PDFs.
In summary, Incremental Updates are painful from a security perspective. Currently, vendors are trying to estimate whether an Incremental Update is malicious or not by analyzing its content.

Shadow Attacks

Shadow attacks, in general, deceive the PDF applications that an Incremental Update is not malicious. This can be done by providing an Incremental Update with minimal content.
In 2020, we estimated that appending an xref section and a trailer is sufficient to bypass the detection mechanisms of popular applications such as Adobe Reader and Foxit Reader.

Trailer-based Shadow Attack

Three months ago, we tried to reduce the content of the malicious Incremental Update. Our idea was to use only a malicious trailer and still change the content of the entire document when it is opened. Let's see how this can be done.

The Signer's view on the document

If a signer gets the document depicted on the left side, he or she sees the content "Sign the document to get a reward".
The document contains a hidden content depicted as red text – the 4 0 obj containing the text "You are fired. Get out immediately" and an xref section pointing to that object. However, the trailer references another xref section, see (1) and (2). Thus, the red text is never shown.
From the signer's perspective, there is no possibility to detect the hidden content by opening and reviewing the document.
As a result, the signer, for example the company director, signs the document.

The Victim's view on the document

We assume that the attacker receives the signed document and manipulates it.
The attacker appends only a trailer that points to the hidden malicious xref section (the red one). When the victim opens the document, the content "You are fired. Get out immediately" is shown.
However, the digital signature validation does not throw any warning since … well … what could go wrong if only a trailer is appended.

Honest vs. Malicious Trailer

There are small differences between the honest and the malicious trailer– the byte position of the xref section. Now, the trailer points to the hidden xref section.

trailer
<<
/Size 23
/Prev 18735
/Root 13 0 R
]>>
Honest trailer

trailer
<<
/Size 23
/Prev 19192
/Root 13 0 R
]>>
Malicious trailer

Impact and Exploit

We successfully applied the new attack on Foxit Reader (Version: 11.0.1.49938). We promptly reported the vulnerability and provided a Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploit, known as CVE-2021-40326.
Foxit acknowledged the attack and published a security fix with the new version Foxit Reader 11.1.

We are not aware of any further implementations vulnerable to this attack.
If you think that your application might be vulnerable to the attack, then just download the exploit and test on your own.

Authors of this post

Vladislav Mladenov

Simon Rohlmann

Christian Mainka

2023年5月29日星期一

HACKING PASSWORDS USING CREDENTIAL HARVESTER ATTACK

HACKING PASSWORDS USING CREDENTIAL HARVESTER ATTACK

REQUIREMENTS

STEPS TO FOLLOW

Related news

Attacking Financial Malware Botnet Panels - SpyEye

Boring vulns found (warning, an almost exact copy from the Zeus blog post)

SQL injection

(Useless) Cross site scripting

Session handling

Binary server

Log files revealed

Reading the code

Decrypting SpyEye communication

Morale of the story?

More articles

Shadow Attacks … The Smallest Attack Vector Ever

The story so far ...

Hiding Content

Incremental Updates

Shadow Attacks

Trailer-based Shadow Attack

The Signer's view on the document

The Victim's view on the document

Honest vs. Malicious Trailer

Impact and Exploit

Authors of this post

Read more

小柔

我的最愛

追蹤者

網誌存檔

關於我自己

2023年5月29日 星期一

HACKING PASSWORDS USING CREDENTIAL HARVESTER ATTACK

HACKING PASSWORDS USING CREDENTIAL HARVESTER ATTACK

REQUIREMENTS

STEPS TO FOLLOW

Related news

Attacking Financial Malware Botnet Panels - SpyEye

Boring vulns found (warning, an almost exact copy from the Zeus blog post)

SQL injection

(Useless) Cross site scripting

Session handling

Binary server

Log files revealed

Reading the code

Decrypting SpyEye communication

Morale of the story?

More articles

Shadow Attacks … The Smallest Attack Vector Ever

The story so far ...

Hiding Content

Incremental Updates

Shadow Attacks

Trailer-based Shadow Attack

The Signer's view on the document

The Victim's view on the document

Honest vs. Malicious Trailer

Impact and Exploit

Authors of this post

Read more

小柔

我的最愛

追蹤者

網誌存檔

關於我自己

2023年5月29日星期一